Skip to content

Food self-sufficiency by country

What can a country produce, and where does it depend on trade? Explore food groups, production, imports and the limits of feeding a population from domestic supply.

51 country studiesDated production & diet evidence

Production coverage is only part of the answer. These studies do not establish an adequate diet without trade or how long a country could survive a disruption.

Compare food-production coverage

FAOSTAT · 2023

Which foods can each country’s production cover? Compare the same year and measure. These are production rankings, not survival scores.

Cereals · 41 ranked · 4 unavailable

Production relative to domestic use before stock movements · 2023
RankCountryCerealsGroups ≥100%2021–2023
1Bulgaria482%2 confirmed2 unavailableAt least 100% all 3 years
2Ukraine414%4 confirmed2 unavailableAt least 100% all 3 years
3Lithuania331%4 confirmed2 unavailableAt least 100% all 3 years
4Estonia261%4 confirmed1 unavailableAt least 100% all 3 years
5Latvia225%5 confirmed1 unavailableAt least 100% all 3 years
6Moldova216%3 confirmed2 unavailableAt least 100% all 3 years
7Slovakia171%2 confirmed1 unavailableAt least 100% all 3 years
8France155%3 confirmed2 unavailableAt least 100% all 3 years
9Czechia151%3 confirmed1 unavailableAt least 100% all 3 years
10Poland149%7 of 9At least 100% all 3 years
11Russia141%3 confirmed1 unavailableAt least 100% all 3 years
12Croatia141%1 confirmed2 unavailableAt least 100% all 3 years
13Hungary138%3 confirmed2 unavailableAt least 100% all 3 years
14Serbia124%3 confirmed1 unavailableAt least 100% all 3 years
15Sweden111%2 of 9At least 100% all 3 years
16Denmark106%4 confirmed2 unavailableIncomplete record
17Finland102%2 of 9Below 100% in 1 of 3 years
18Germany99%2 of 9Below 100% in 2 of 3 years
19Belarus96%4 confirmed1 unavailableBelow 100% in 3 of 3 years
20Austria78%1 confirmed2 unavailableBelow 100% in 3 of 3 years
21United Kingdom76%0 confirmed1 unavailableBelow 100% in 3 of 3 years
22North Macedonia72%2 confirmed2 unavailableBelow 100% in 3 of 3 years
23Greece69%2 confirmed2 unavailableBelow 100% in 3 of 3 years
24Türkiye68%5 confirmed1 unavailableBelow 100% in 3 of 3 years
25Azerbaijan66%3 confirmed1 unavailableBelow 100% in 3 of 3 years
26Albania61%2 of 9Below 100% in 3 of 3 years
27Luxembourg60%0 confirmed2 unavailableBelow 100% in 3 of 3 years
28Bosnia and Herzegovina58%1 confirmed1 unavailableBelow 100% in 3 of 3 years
29Italy55%1 confirmed1 unavailableBelow 100% in 3 of 3 years
30Slovenia53%0 confirmed2 unavailableBelow 100% in 3 of 3 years
31Switzerland36%0 confirmed2 unavailableBelow 100% in 3 of 3 years
32Spain34%4 confirmed1 unavailableBelow 100% in 3 of 3 years
33Georgia31%0 confirmed3 unavailableIncomplete record
34Belgium28%2 confirmed4 unavailableBelow 100% in 3 of 3 years
35Norway19%2 of 9Below 100% in 3 of 3 years
36Portugal17%1 confirmed1 unavailableBelow 100% in 3 of 3 years
37Netherlands8%2 confirmed4 unavailableBelow 100% in 3 of 3 years
38Cyprus7%1 confirmed3 unavailableBelow 100% in 3 of 3 years
39Iceland5%2 confirmed1 unavailableBelow 100% in 3 of 3 years
40Montenegro3%0 confirmed2 unavailableBelow 100% in 3 of 3 years
41Malta0%0 confirmed3 unavailableBelow 100% in 3 of 3 years
—ArmeniaUnavailableAccounting residual exceeds 5% of domestic supply0 confirmed3 unavailableIncomplete record
—IrelandUnavailableAccounting residual exceeds 5% of domestic supply3 confirmed1 unavailableIncomplete record
—KazakhstanUnavailableAccounting residual exceeds 5% of domestic supply2 confirmed2 unavailableIncomplete record
—RomaniaUnavailableAccounting residual exceeds 5% of domestic supply1 confirmed2 unavailableIncomplete record

Scroll sideways for group coverage and history.

Unavailable figures are unranked, never zero. Breadth ranks require all 9 groups. Japan’s MAFF measures are separate. How comparisons work

Compare all food groups

Green: at least 100%. Amber: below 100%. Grey: unavailable. Surpluses in one food cannot offset every gap in another.

Same screened ratios · 2023 · scroll sideways to compare foods
CountryCerealsStarchy rootsVegetablesFruitMeatMilk, excl. butterFish & seafoodPulsesEggs
Albania61%91%105%91%48%87%60%76%110%
Armenia—96%96%—62%78%—38%98%
Austria78%81%33%37%114%——73%89%
Azerbaijan66%90%106%129%88%88%—62%101%
Belarus96%103%just under 100%68%121%—8%102%102%
Belgium28%132%——195%—7%—35%
Bosnia and Herzegovina58%88%82%78%54%80%—85%100%
Bulgaria482%50%59%48%51%50%——137%
Croatia141%49%65%—57%43%—44%81%
Cyprus7%141%44%—63%——20%62%
Czechia151%66%19%21%51%118%—147%80%
Denmark106%104%23%6%269%81%394%——
Estonia261%68%8%—73%143%303%313%58%
Finland102%88%39%5%92%83%81%97%115%
France155%128%67%—90%—31%121%97%
Georgia31%83%52%—45%71%—22%—
Germany99%135%22%29%108%90%24%78%69%
Greece69%44%116%162%53%——77%77%
Hungary138%47%116%—116%90%—78%87%
Iceland5%32%10%0%87%100%5,217%—80%
Ireland—48%17%5%248%107%229%86%72%
Italy55%39%144%—76%75%17%25%96%
Kazakhstan—118%92%31%84%70%—133%96%
Latvia225%86%—10%58%128%193%720%222%
Lithuania331%82%—21%77%—108%702%104%
Luxembourg60%41%5%11%38%——50%12%
Malta0%21%43%13%25%20%———
Moldova216%76%93%203%69%61%—100%—
Montenegro3%55%34%39%16%55%—67%—
Netherlands8%——20%208%—124%3%—
North Macedonia72%84%115%101%24%56%—80%—
Norway19%91%21%5%95%86%248%12%101%
Poland149%105%90%155%160%104%50%102%203%
Portugal17%35%170%78%73%57%—25%96%
Romania—68%54%68%66%79%—84%103%
Russia141%99%86%41%101%94%—277%just under 100%
Serbia124%84%102%107%89%76%—76%85%
Slovakia171%42%20%18%31%52%—103%74%
Slovenia53%45%20%35%—99%—25%86%
Spain34%52%193%134%151%73%—32%109%
Sweden111%71%18%5%71%68%53%109%93%
Switzerland36%76%27%—85%93%—22%54%
Türkiye68%just under 100%109%130%111%just over 100%—80%119%
Ukraine414%just over 100%96%89%120%97%——105%
United Kingdom76%68%19%9%70%73%53%—88%
How comparisons work

Food-group ratios use production ÷ (production + imports − exports), before stock movements. The denominator includes uses such as animal feed, not only human food. A high ratio does not establish an adequate diet or independence from imported inputs.

Ranks use unrounded, screened ratios; displayed percentages are rounded. Equal values share a rank. Unavailable or held ratios remain below the ranked countries with no position. A high production ratio can coexist with food imports.

Breadth counts selected groups at or above 100%, with equal weight and no averaging of their percentages. Only complete baskets are ranked; the count is not a measure of nutritional adequacy. These nine groups do not represent every food.

The history check uses the three calendar years ending in 2023; a missing or held year makes it incomplete. Three years do not establish resilience to a future crisis. European scope includes the wider countries listed below. All studies means the prepared FAOSTAT sample, not a global ranking.

Source: FAOSTAT Food Balances. All values come from the same screened records used on the linked country pages, which retain source editions, geographic caveats and review reasons. Japan uses a different national method and fiscal years and is excluded.

Europe 39 studies

Wider European scope 6 studies

Other country studies 6 studies

How to read these studies

FAOSTAT studies compare production with domestic supply by food group. A surplus in one group cannot make up for every gap elsewhere. Imported feed, fertiliser, energy, distribution and household access also matter.

Japan uses MAFF’s national calorie- and production-value measures and fiscal years. These differ from the FAOSTAT group ratios and should not be used together as a country ranking.

Every page keeps its own periods, sources, missing figures and review notes. The dates above describe the included history, not live conditions.

Coverage & geography

Europe follows UN M49 statistical geography. The wider scope separately includes Armenia, Azerbaijan, Cyprus, Georgia, Kazakhstan and Türkiye. This is a browsing convention, not a sovereignty claim.

No study available here for Åland Islands, Andorra, Faroe Islands, Gibraltar, Guernsey, Holy See, Isle of Man, Jersey, Liechtenstein, Monaco, San Marino, Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands. Missing coverage is not evidence of low food production.

Source identity remains under review for Kosovo; no neighbouring country’s figures are substituted.

Analysis by CropArc · Editorial review . Source years are shown with each chart.